Xanthogranulomatous salpingo-oophoritis presenting as an ovarian tumour
- 1 General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- 2 Pathology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- 3 Gynecology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
- Correspondence to Dr Andreia Amado; andreiapiresbranco@hotmail.com
Abstract
Xanthogranulomatous salpingo-oophoritis (XGSO) is an exceptionally rare entity. Its clinical manifestations and imaging modalities can mimic benign and malignant adnexal diseases, making it difficult to diagnose. Here we report a case of XGSO in a young woman who was operated with suspicion of a borderline ovarian tumour. Preoperative diagnosis of XGSO should be considered to avoid radical surgical treatment, especially in young patients.
Background
Xanthogranulomatous inflammation results from the accumulation of lipid-laden foamy macrophages with lymphocytes, neutrophils and plasma cells along with multinucleated giant cells.1 It is responsible for chronic inflammation, which leads to the destruction of the affected organ, with kidney being the most commonly affected organ.2 Xanthogranulomatous inflammation affecting the female genital tract is extremely rare and usually involves the endometrium, fallopian tube and ovaries.3 Reported cases usually present as a pelvic inflammatory disease that does not respond to antibiotics or as a mass lesion simulating adnexal malignancy.4 Here we report a case of xanthogranulomatous salpingo-oophoritis (XGSO) in a woman who was operated with suspicion of a borderline ovarian tumour.
Case presentation
A nulliparous woman attended at gynaecological service with intermittent lower abdominal pain of 3 months duration without other complaints. The pain was more intense in the left iliac fossa, it did not radiate and worsened with sexual intercourse. She refused any vaginal discharge or abnormal bleeding, fever, nausea, vomiting, urinary problems or bowel habit changes. She had menarche at 13 years old, with regular menses. There was no preceding pathological history of importance. General examination revealed good general condition, with normal vital sings, coloured and hydrated mucous membranes. Abdominal examination revealed a soft and non-tender abdomen and there was no palpable mass. On per vaginal examination, a firm left adnexal mass could be palpated.
Investigations
Ultrasonography (USG) showed a left adnexal mass measuring 88×75 mm, with low flux resistance vascularisation and multiple septations. Her complete blood count was within a normal range. Cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) was 35.2 U/mL, carcinoembryonic antigen was 1.05 mg/mL, Ca 19.9 was 21 mg/mL and beta-human chorionic gonadotropin <2 U/mL. The patient was submitted to a left adnexectomy with frozen section histopathology in view of suspected borderline ovarian tumour.
Differential diagnosis
Differential diagnosis of an adnexal mass with 8 cm and multiple septations includes an ovarian tumour, endometrioma, tubo-ovarian abscess, tuberculosis and fungal infections.
Neoplastic lesions can be ruled only in histopathological examination. Abscess, tuberculosis and fungal infections can be confirmed by culture and special stains for the causative organisms.
Treatment
An exploratory laparoscopy with extensive adhesyolisis was performed. There was a mass measuring 8 cm on the left adnexa, which was densely adhered to the omentum and large bowel. The patient underwent a left salpingo-oophorectomy. The frozen section examination revealed tissue extensively infiltrated by histiocytoids, plasma cells and lymphocytes with necrosis—an aspect suggestive of a chronic and xanthomatous inflammatory process. No unmistakable evidence of malignancy. Final histopathological examination (figure 1A–D) showed ovarian and fallopian tube with dense granulation tissue formation with abundant foamy macrophages, surrounded by fibrocollagenous tissue showing infiltration by lymphoplasmacytic cells and macrophages, along with congested blood vessels. Thus, a final diagnosis of XGSO was given.
Histopathological findings of left salpingo-ophorectomy. On haematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E), severe chronic inflammation was found, with infiltration of the ovary (A and B) and fallopian tube (C and D) by dense sheets of plasmocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and histiocytes, some with foamy cytoplasm. There were several foci of fibrosis, suppuration and granulation tissue. (A—H&E, 20×; B—H&E, 100×; C—H&E, 100×; D—H&E, 100 ×).
Outcome and follow-up
The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged on the third postoperative day. Ten days later, the patient returned to the gynaecological service with fever, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. Her abdomen was distended, slightly depressing and painful in the lower quadrants. Transvaginal ultrasound revealed a palpable pelvic swelling between the pouch of Douglas and the umbilical area. Pelvic USG revealed a pelvic swelling surrounding the uterus. She was hospitalised again and underwent antibiotic therapy with clindamycin and gentamicin. Pelvic abscess was submitted to drainage by intervention radiology with favourable outcome.
Discussion
Xanthogranulomatous inflammation affecting the female genital tract is extremely rare and can affect endometrium, fallopian tubes or ovaries, which clinically forms mass-like lesion in the pelvic cavity.1 4 5 It has been found in patients aged 21–75 years with a mean age of 45 years.3 4 6 The presenting complaints are abdominal pain, abdominal mass, fever, anaemia, loss of appetite and menstrual irregularities. On pelvic examination, adnexal mass is usually palpable with or without tenderness. On radiological findings, the features resemble malignant ovarian tumours.7
The exact aetiology of this entity is not clear but it is associated with several conditions: pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, intrauterine contraceptive device, ineffective antibiotic therapy, abnormality in lipid metabolism, radiotherapy and ineffective clearance of bacteria by phagocytes.1 In the literature, only seven cases of xanthogranulomatous inflammation affecting both fallopian tube and ovary were reported.1 4 6 8 Tara et al reported a case of XGSO in a 68-year-old woman with a pelvic mass and high level of tumour markers who was submitted to a total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with suspicion of adnexal tumour.8 Portela et al described another case of XGSO in a 35-year-old woman with endometriosis, suffering from chronic pelvic pain and long-standing infertility. Right salpingectomy and oophorectomy were performed after imagiological finding of an endometriotic infiltration lesion at the right uterosacral ligament location that correlated with the painful area detected at bimanual exam.6 Final diagnosis of XGSO was only possible after histopathological examination as the case we reported. The majority of case reports in the literature mainly report xanthogranulomatous inflammation affecting only the ovary or the fallopian tube alone.1 3 4 7 9
The destructive and mass-forming nature of the disease makes it hard to distinguish it from malignancy both clinically and radiologically, as the case we reported. In these cases, frozen section examination of the affected organ is helpful in the diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous inflammation and intraoperative management, avoiding radical surgeries. The treatment of XGSO is salpingo-oophorectomy alone. Knowledge of the condition and high level of suspicion by both surgeon and pathologist will help in the appropriate management.
Learning points
-
Clinical manifestations and imaging modalities of xanthogranulomatous salpingo-oophoritis (XGSO) can mimic benign and malignant adnexal diseases, making it difficult to diagnose.
-
Frozen section histopathology is crucial in cases of dilemma, avoiding radical surgeries.
-
The treatment of XGSO is salpingo-oophorectomy alone.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
We thank João Gonçalves for clinical care and critical review of the manuscript.
Footnotes
-
Contributors AT contributed to case report writing, data collection and discussion writing. DJ contributed to histological images and their description. AA and IG critically reviewed the manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer